1
An Introduction to Rights, 2d English-language ed., forthcoming 2012 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
2
Review of Ronald Dworkin, Justice for Hedgehogs (2011) forthcoming in Law and Philosophy
3
Politics in a State of Nature. forthcoming 2012 in Ratio Juris
4
Coercion. forthcoming 2012, in the Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Law
5
Schmegality. Review of Scott J. Shapiro, Legality, Jurisprudence 2: 273-91 (2011)
6
Consent and Its Cousins. Ethics 121: 335-53 (2011)
7
Political Authority, Moral Powers, and the Intrinsic Value of Obedience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2010 30: 179-91
8
“‘Interpreting Legal Texts’ or, ‘When Is Using a Firearm Not Really?’ --An Eminent Philosopher of Language Helps Us Decide” for Jotwell, a blog -- http://jotwell.com/ Oct. 6, 2010
9
Review of Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy (2008) Ethics 120 : 869–73 (July 2010)
10
Pluralism, Intransitivity, Incoherence In Mark White, ed., Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics (Cambridge 2009)
11
Review of Christopher Wellman and A. John Simmons, The Duty to Obey the Law: For or Against (2005) Law and Philosophy 28: 101-107 (2009)
12
Schauer on Precedent in the U.S. Supreme Court, Georgia State University Law Review, vol. 24, no. 2, Winter 2007, 403-13
13
Adding Reasons Up. In Barbara Montero and Mark White, eds., Economics and Mind (Routledge 2007)
14
The Virtue of Law-Abidance. Philosophers’ Imprint, vol. 6, no. 4, 1-21 (December 2006) www.philosophersimprint.org
15
Review of Tom Campbell, Rights: A Critical Introduction (2006). Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=8225
16
William Godwin. Letter to the Editor, The Times Literary Supplement, January 13, 2006, at 15
17
“First Force” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy www.jesp.org, (2005), vol. 1, no. 3, 1-8
18
Comments on Richard Arneson’s “Joel Feinberg and the Justification of Hard Paternalism” Legal Theory 11: 286-91 (2005)
19
An Introduction to Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004; Portuguese ed., Uma introdução aos direitos, E. Ferriera E Silva & N. Eichemburg, trans. (São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2006)
20
The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law, co-edited with Martin P. Golding (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004)
21
Privacy. In The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (2004)
22
State of the Art: The Duty to Obey the Law. Legal Theory 10: 215-59 (2004); reprinted in Lloyd's Introduction to Jurisprudence (Sweet and Maxwell 2009)
23
Locke and Load. Law and Philosophy 22: 195-216 (2003)(review essay on A. John Simmons, Justification and Legitimacy)
24
“She” Letter to the Editor, The Times Literary Supplement, August 22, 2003, at 13
25
Afterword: Proportionality and the Difference Death Makes. Criminal Justice Ethics 21: 40-43 (2002)
26
The Contextualist Answer to Skepticism and What a Lawyer Cannot Know Florida State University Law Review 30: 1-23 (2002), response by Rob Atkinson
27
Social Meaning, Compliance Conditions, and Law's Claim to Authority. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 15: 51-67 (2002)
28
Civility as Political Constraint. Res Publica 8: 217-29 (2002)
29
Speeding: A Sprawling Offense? Fulton County Daily Report (Oct. 25, 2002)
30
Abstract of Liam Murphy, “Beneficence, Law, and Liberty: The Case of Required Rescue,” APA Newsletter on Law and Philosophy 101: 130-31 (Spring 2002)
31
Review of Brian Leiter, ed., Objectivity in Law and Morals (2001). Philosophical Inquiry 23: 123-26 (2002)
32
Review of Arthur Ripstein, Equality, Responsibility, and the Law (1998) Ethics 111: 644-48 (2001)
33
Abstracts of Ken Kress, “Why No Judge Should Be a Dworkinian Coherentist”and of Elizabeth Anderson and Richard Pildes, “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement,” APA Newsletter on Law and Philosophy 100: 147-48 (Spring 2001)
34
The Duty to Obey the Law: Selected Philosophical Readings (Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999)
35
Introduction: Some Recent Work on Political Obligation. APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Law 99: 62-67 (Fall 1999)
36
Review of Antony Duff, ed., Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique(1998) Philosophy in Review/Comptes rendus philosophiques 19: 327-29 (1999)
37
Three Anarchical Fallacies: An Essay on Political Authority (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998, paperback ed. 2007) A Choice “Outstanding Academic Book” for 1999
38
Legitimate Authority without Political Obligation. Law and Philosophy 17:43-60 (1998)(Chinese translation in Political Authority (Zhejiang University Press, 2010, forthcoming)
39
The Antinomy of Coherence and Determinacy. Iowa Law Review 82: 1-20 (1996) abstracted in APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Law (Fall, 1998)
40
Clinton & the Jones Case. Letter to the Editors, The New York Review of Books, April 23, 1998, at 65, with response by Irangate Special Counsel Lawrence Walsh
41
Abstract of John Rawls, “The Idea of Public Reason” APA Newsletter on Law and Philosophy 97:108 (Spring 1998)
42
Review of Jaap C. Hage, Reasoning with Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic (1997) Philosophy in Review/Comptes rendus philosophiques 18:182-83 (1998)
43
Book note. Ethics 107:556-57 (1997)
44
Transparency and Indeterminacy in the Liberal Critique of Critical Legal Studies. Seton Hall Law Review 556-602 (1993) abstracted in APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Law (Spring, 1996)
45
Letter to Word Court, The Atlantic Monthly, January, 1996, at 116
46
Is Law Coercive? Legal Theory 1:81-111 (1995)
47
Review of Kevin Ashley, Modeling Legal Argument (1990) Philosophical Psychology 7:135-37 (1994)
48
Review of Stephen Guest, Ronald Dworkin (1991). Ethics 104:394-96 (1994)
49
Rethinking Exclusionary Reasons: A Second Edition of Joseph Raz's Practical Reason and Norms. Law and Philosophy 12:329-43 (1993)
50
Book note. Ethics 103:627 (1993)
51
British Privacy Debate Swayed U.S. Decisions. Letter to the Editor, The New York Times, Sept. 3, 1992, at A14, col. 4
52
Book note. Ethics 102:887 (1992)
53
Book note. Ethics 102:193-94 (1991)
54
Liberalism, Legal Decisionmaking and Morality “As Such” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 10:505-21 (1990)
55
The “Race-of-the-Victim” Effect in Capital Sentencing: McClesky v. Kemp and Underadjustment Bias. Jurimetrics Journal 32:125-41 (1990)
56
Are Law and Morality Distinct? Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 4:33-53 (1990)
57
Lawyers’ Justice. Michigan Law Review 88:1833-57 (1990) (reviewing David Luban, Lawyers and Justice and Philip Heymann & Lance Liebman, The Social Responsibilities of Lawyers)
58
Review of Raoul Berger, Death Penalties (1982) Duke Law Journal 1984: 624-29
59
Discovery of Federal Income Tax Returns and the New “Qualified” Privileges. Duke Law Journal 1984:938-62, reprinted in Monthly Digest of Tax Articles 16:16-26 (1985)
60
Moral Relativism and the Basis of Obligation. Doctoral Dissertation (University Microfilms, 1982)