Law Review
Georgia State University
Commerce and TradeEnforcement of Master Settlement Agreement: Require Certifications by Certain Tobacco Manufacturers; Provide for a Directory Database of Certified Tobacco Manufacturers; Establish a Prohibition Against Sales by Tobacco Manufacturers Not in the Directory DatabaseMatthew S. Knoop
History The National Association of Attorneys General promoted this
legislation.[1]
Similar bills are pending or have already passed in 39 other states.[2] These bills complement the national
Master Settlement Agreement (“MSA”), a compromise between four major cigarette
manufacturers and 46 states.[3]
These four manufacturers agreed to pay more than $200 billion over 25 years in
exchange for those states’ agreeing not to file lawsuits during that time
period.[4]
The MSA also includes provisions for state-established escrow funds into which
non-participating tobacco companies must pay in order to satisfy pending and
future lawsuits.[5]
In 1999, the Georgia General Assembly codified this requirement in Code section
HB 893 That same day, HB 893 was assigned to the Senate Regulated Industries
Committee, which favorably reported the bill without change on The Act HB 893 amends Title 10 of the Code, by adding a new Chapter
13A.[18]
Code section 10-13A-1 describes the motivation behind the Act, stating that
“violations of Chapter 13 of this [T]itle threaten the integrity of the tobacco
[MSA], the fiscal soundness of the state, and the public health.”[19] Code section 10-13A-2 expands the definitions
applicable to Chapter 13A to include companies that are not signatories to the
MSA.[20]
Code section 10-13A-3 requires every tobacco manufacturer whose cigarettes
enter the The Act amends Code section 48-11-8, by replacing subsection (b) with similar gender-neutral language.[29] The Act also adds paragraph (a)(3), which explicitly references new Chapter 13A of Title 10.[30] The Act amends Code section 48-11-9, which defines contraband material, by striking paragraph (a)(1) and replacing it with text that explicitly refers to new Chapter 13A of Title 10.[31] Finally, the Act amends Code subsection 48-11-23.1(b), by explicitly adding the packages covered by new Chapter 13A of Title 10 to the list of packages and containers to which no individual may affix a tax stamp.[32]
[1].
See Interview with [2]. See id.; see also Jim Wallace, Bill May Protect Settlement Funds, Measures Target Small Tobacco Companies, Charleston Daily Mail, Mar. 5, 2003, at P3C (noting West Virginia Senate Finance Committee approval of a similar bill in the West Virginia state legislature). [3]. See George Whitehurst, Philip Morris Makes Payment, Danville Reg. & Bee, Apr. 16, 2003, at 1; see also Lane Interview, supra note 1 (noting that the funding to fight tobacco-related illnesses primarily came from Medicaid dollars, which the states sought to recover from manufacturers). [5].
Tribal Tobacco Company Can’t Sue Other State Attorneys General, 18 [8].
[12]. See State of Georgia Final Composite Status Sheet, HB 893, Apr. 25, 2003; Georgia House of Representatives Voting Record, HB 893 (Mar. 28, 2003). [20].
See O.C.G.A. § 10-13A-2 (Supp. 2003); see also Audio Recording of
Senate Proceedings, [29]. Compare 1955 Ga. Laws 268, § 9, at 277 (formerly found at O.C.G.A. § 48-11-8 (2000)), with O.C.G.A. § 48-11-8 (Supp. 2003). [30]. Compare 1955 Ga. Laws 268, § 9, at 277 (formerly found at O.C.G.A. § 48-11-8 (2000)), with O.C.G.A. § 48-11-8 (Supp. 2003).
|




