ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS v MINETA
Appeal from Adarand Constructors v Slater, 228 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000)
Supreme Court Docket No. 00-730
Petition for Certiorari Granted March 26, 2001
Argued Wednesday, October 31, 2001
Certiorari Dismissed as Improvidently Granted on November 27, 2001 (122 Supreme Court Reporter 511).

BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND COMPARATIVE LAW SCHOLARS IN SUPPORT OF NEITHER PARTY (Filed June 1, 2001)

*Read HTML Text Version on line
*Download in Wordperfect
*Download in PDF (Exact Copy) 

INFORMATION ABOUT MEMBERS OF THE AMICUS GROUP

RECENT NEWSPAPER ARTICLES ABOUT THE ADARAND CASE
Does India hold the key to affirmative action?, by Marcia Coyle (The National Law Journal  August 20, 2001) [describes amicus brief filed by social science and comparative law scholars]
***SHOULD THE GOVERNMENT CONFESS ERROR IN ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS? Additional Information

Ashcroft, Olson Take Middle Ground in 'Adarand' Brief, by Tony Mauro (American Lawyer Media  August 13, 2001)
Revisiting 'Adarand': Solicitor general draws fire over affirmative action law, by Tony Mauro (Legal Times  August 13, 2001)
More Fights Ahead on Affirmative Action, by Otis Bilodeau (Legal Times August 20, 2001)
Like a Pretzel: Conservatives cross fingers and twist beliefs defending Adarand, by Roger Clegg (Legal Times August 20, 2001)
Bush Administration Supports An Affirmative Action Policy, by Neil A. Lewis ( New York Times August 11, 2001, p. A9 ) [not available on this web site]
Supreme Court Debate Focuses on Procedural Issues in Affirmative Action Case, by Linda Greenhouse ( New York Times November 1, 2001, p. A20 ) [not available on this web site]

Cunningham, Loury & Skrentny: PASSING STRICT SCRUTINY: USING SOCIAL SCIENCE TO DESIGN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS [90 GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL 835 (April 2002)] (Expands upon issues in Amicus brief and also addresses the University of Michigan affirmative action cases) 

SELECTED MATERIALS CITED IN AMICUS BRIEF OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND COMPARATIVE LAW SCHOLARS:

Economic Analysis of Racial Inequality
Glenn C. Loury,
W.E.B. DuBois Lectures at Harvard University (April 25-27, 2000)

Psychological Research on Stereotype Threat
Claude Steele, 
Thin Ice: Stereotype Threat and Black College Students, 284 Atlantic Monthly 44
(Aug. 1999)

History of Racial Presumptions in Federal Contracting
George R. LaNoue & John C. Sullivan, Presumptions for Preferences: The Small Business Administration's Decisions on Groups Entitled to Affirmative Action,
6 Journal of Policy History 439 (1994) 

Affirmative Action in India
**Clark D. Cunningham, Lessons on Affirmative Action from India," 1 The Subcontinental: A Journal of South Asian American Political Identity 51-56 (Summer 2003) (Special Issue on Affirmative Action).
** Clark D. Cunningham, Affirmative Action: Comparative Policies and Controversies," International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2002)
**Clark D. Cunningham, Affirmative Action: India's Example,
4 Civil Rights Journal 22 (1999)
**Clark D. Cunningham & N.R. Madhava Menon, Race, Class,Caste ...? Rethinking Affirmative Action, 97 Michigan Law Review 1296 (1999)
**Cass R. Sunstein, Affirmative Action, Caste, and Cultural Comparison, 97 Michigan Law Review 1311 (1999)
**Clark D. Cunningham & N. R. Madhava Menon, Seeking Equality in Multicultural Societies
**
Rethinking Equality in the Global Society Conference (In 1997 Washington University hosted a conference bringing together social scientists, legal scholars and government officials from the U.S., India and South Africa to look at the issue of affirmative action from new perspectives.  This is a very extensive web site containing transcripts of the conference and many of the papers presented at the conference.)

The U.S. Department of Transportation Program for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
- Affidavit of Social and Economic Disadvantage (application for DBE status)

--Proposed Reforms to Affirmative Action in Federal Procurement, U.S. Department of Justice (Published May 23, 1996 in 61 Federal Register 26041) (PDF format, 23 pages)
--Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, Final Rule, U.S. Department of Transportation (Published February 2, 1999 in 64 Federal Register 5095 with 32 pages of background and explanatory material) (PDF format, 52 pages)
--Proposed Revisions to DBE Regulations, U.S. Department of Transportation (Published May 8, 2001 in 66 Federal Register 23208) (PDF format, 19 pages)
--Report to Congressional Committees on DBE Program, General Accounting Office (Report GAO-01-586 June 1, 2001) (PDF format, 85 pages)
--Department of Transportation Web Site on the DBE Program 

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ADARAND CASE

Supreme Court Order Defining the Issues
Supreme Court Docket in Adarand Case

Brief of Adarand Constructors (Petitioner), filed June 11, 2001
*Read Text Version on line
*Download in PDF (Exact Copy) 

Amicus Briefs filed in support of Adarand Constructors on June 11, 2001: download in PDF (exact copy)
Associated General Contractors of America
Center for Individual Rights
The Claremont Institute: Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence 
Geod Corporation and the Atlantic Legal Foundation 
L.S. Lee, Inc.
Pacific Legal Legal Foundation
Southeastern Legal Foundation 

Brief of U.S. Government (Respondent), filed August 10, 2001
*Download brief in PDF (Exact Copy)
**Table of Contents to Appendix, Respondent's Brief
Brief of U.S. Government in Opposition to Petition for Certiorari, filed January 19, 2001
*Read Text Version on line
*Download in PDF (Exact Copy) 
The Office of the Solicitor General, U.S. Department of Justice, maintains a web site on which are posted all briefs as they are filed in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Amicus Briefs filed in support of U.S. Government (Respondent), filed August 10, 2001: download in PDF (exact copy)
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights under Law, et al
City and County of Denver
NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund, et al [international and  comparative law are relevant: (1) the American common law system embraces an empirical approach, and (2) in an era of globalization, the Supreme Court will maintain its intellectual leadership by acknowledging the international dimension of its decisions]
Senator Max Baucus, et al. 
Women First National Legislative Committee., et al. 
Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, et al [HTML version] 
National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium, et al [not yet posted]
National League of Cities, et al. 
Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense, et al 
NAACP Legal Defense Fund 

Reply Brief of Adarand Constructors (Petitioner), filed September 10, 2001 [HTML text version]

The Mountain States Legal Foundation, counsel for Petitioner Adarand Constructors, has an extensive Adarand web site which includes all prior published court decisions in the case and other information.  

Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, in conjunction with the Oyez Project, offers continually updated coverage of the cases pending before the United States Supreme Court on its Docket web site. This site contains a feature story about the Adarand case as well as a longer background article with a variety of useful web links.

The Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense and Education Fund has an extensive web site on affirmative action.


For further information contact
Clark D. Cunningham
W. Lee Burge Professor of Law and Ethics
Georgia State University College of Law
P.O. Box 4037
Atlanta, GA 30302-4037
Phone: (404) 651-1242
Fax: (404) 651-2092
Email: cdcunningham@gsu.edu
Last updated  November 3, 2006

Hit Counter